Friday, 24 December 2010
Tuesday, 7 December 2010
Cosplay: dressing-up in a Virtual World
Talk about living out the narrative! This is what Jean Baudrillard and Elaine Graham call 'hyper-reality': Virtual worlds inspiring people to presents themselves in ways that transcend their real selves and become something different, a ‘hyper-real’ or post-human self.
Human life is enriched by taking up, or immersing ourselves within, the existential spaces - whether real or virtual - which we inhabit, or the narratives we read and experience. Cosplay, an assimilation of virtual reality into our humanity, promises offers meaning and pleasure and fun.
Are there spaces and narratives that offer an assimilation, for want of a better word, of theological realities into humanity that are enriching, meaningful, pleasurable and life-giving without the need to go beyond reality or what it means to be human?
Wednesday, 10 November 2010
Wednesday, 4 August 2010
'Christo-aesthetic'
Tuesday, 3 August 2010
Drink Offering
Tuesday, 20 July 2010
An ode to A2
I will remember with great fondness the moments of divine help within these walls as Jacob upon awaking from sleep on his journey and say:
'Surely [God] is in this place - and I did not know it!' (Genesis 28.16).
Tuesday, 9 February 2010
Call to Personhood
Alistair I. McFadyen, The Call to Personhood
Loads of great stuff on the development, ‘sedimentation’ of personhood as a process of communication with the other extrapolated from Barthian and Moltmannian theology of the Trinity. Slightly confused way of understanding the role of the Holy Spirit. A very structural approach. Posits lots of ideals about undistorted forms of communication and human being. Argues that personhood is an embodied phenomenon. Does not entirely accommodate the concept of human uniqueness. You have to read 179 pages until he explains how people with learning difficulties might operate within his schema, and even then it doesn’t quite cut it. He writes,
The indwelling of Christ and the possibilities of participating in a relation conformed to and mediated by him [this needs explanation in itself] are not constrained by mental capacities. Where the level of communicative competence is too low for another to explicate his or her understanding, or to make the grounds for his or her resistance plain, one has to ‘stand in for the other’. This means attempting to reconstruct an understanding from an imaginary, empathetic ‘indwelling’ of the other’s identity and social location.
Although,
Formal reciprocity yields an understanding, admittedly only approximate and vague, of the universal and reciprocal interests or rights of the person. (McFadyen, p 179)
McFadyen might argue that this is not uncommon in other exchanges, but the degree of standing in for the other when relating to someone with an impairment is inevitably more intense. I have witnessed a Day Service Officer working with a gentlemen with learning difficulties for over 20 years and still misjudging a particular response to a call for communication.
